Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseLicencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.creatorBarrera Rojas, Miguel Angel
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-07T21:38:23Z
dc.date.available2020-07-07T21:38:23Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.identifier.citationBarrera Rojas, M. A. (2020). Poverty reduction in Mexico? case study for Quintana Roo 2010-2016. Visión de Futuro, Revista Científica. Posadas (Misiones): UNaM. FCE. PPA; 24(1), 216-235.
dc.identifier.issn1668-8708
dc.identifier.otherVF-034
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12219/2510
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.36995/j.visiondefuturo.2020.24.01.002.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://visiondefuturo.fce.unam.edu.ar/index.php/visiondefuturo/article/view/364/289
dc.descriptionFil: Barrera Rojas, Miguel Angel. University of Quintana Roo. Division of Political Science and Humanities; México.en
dc.description.abstractThis paper evaluates the status of poverty in Quintana Roo, Mexico for the period 2010- 2016. The research question that supports this paper is whether the decrease in extreme poverty and poverty that the federal government of Enrique Peña Nieto asserted as real is actually an improvement in living and income conditions, or if said decrease takes place at based solely on the criteria with which poverty is defined and measured. To this end, cabinet work was carried out in two parts: The first was a review and analysis of the Guidelines and Criteria for the Definition, Identification and Measurement of Poverty that appear in the Official Gazette of the Federation; and the second in the analysis of the data on deprivation and income that the National Council for the Evaluation of Social Development Policy (CONEVAL) and the National Institute of Statistics, Geography and Informatics (INEGI) offer for 2010-2015 and 2010, 2012 , 2014 and 2016, respectively. Among the most important results, it can be mentioned that, in effect, the average shortfalls of the househo in Quintana Roo decreased, however, the income in 2016 remained in conditions similar to those of 2010, that is, the reduction of extreme poverty can be attribute only to state intervention through the creation of infrastructure and not the effectiveness of its economic policies.en
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Misiones. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Programa de Posgrado en Administraciónes_AR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceVisión de Futuro (Misiones), 1-2020; 24(1): pp. 216-235 https://visiondefuturo.fce.unam.edu.ar/index.php/visiondefuturo/index
dc.subjectPovertyen
dc.subjectExtreme Povertyen
dc.subjectSocial Policyen
dc.subjectPoverty Measurementen
dc.subjectQuintana Rooen
dc.titlePoverty reduction in Mexico? case study for Quintana Roo 2010-2016en
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Revista Visión de Futuro [456]
    En esta colección se depositan los artículos publicados en la Revista Semestral del Programa de Posgrado en Administración de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la UNaM

Show simple item record

Licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)