Show simple item record

dc.creatorDugger, Phillip James
dc.creatorBlendinger, Pedro Gerardo
dc.creatorBöhning-Gaese, Katrin
dc.creatorChama, Lackson
dc.creatorCorreia, Marta
dc.creatorDehling, D. Matthias
dc.creatorEmer, Carine
dc.creatorFarwig, Nina
dc.creatorFricke, Evan C.
dc.creatorGaletti, Mauro
dc.creatorGarcía, Daniel
dc.creatorGrass, Ingo
dc.creatorHeleno, Ruben
dc.creatorJacomassa, Fábio André Facco
dc.creatorMoraes, Suelen
dc.creatorMoran, Catherine
dc.creatorMuñoz, Marcia Carolina
dc.creatorNeuschulz, Eike Lena
dc.creatorNowak, Larissa
dc.creatorPiratelli, Augusto
dc.creatorPizo, Marco Aurelio
dc.creatorQuitián, Marta
dc.creatorRogers, Haldre S.
dc.creatorRuggera, Román A.
dc.creatorSaavedra, Francisco
dc.creatorSánchez, Mariano Sebastián
dc.creatorSánchez, Rocío
dc.creatorSantillán, Vinicio
dc.creatorSchabo, Dana G.
dc.creatorRibeiro da Silva, Fernanda
dc.creatorTimóteo, Sérgio
dc.creatorTraveset, Anna
dc.creatorVollstädt, Maximilian GR
dc.creatorSchleuning, Matthias
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-14T18:22:21Z
dc.date.available2023-01-14T18:22:21Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-03
dc.identifier.citationDugger, P. J., Blendinger, P. G., Böhning‐Gaese, K., Chama, L., Correia, M., Dehling, D. M.,… y Schleuning, M. (2019). Seed‐dispersal networks are more specialized in the Neotropics than in the Afrotropics. Global Ecology and Biogeography. Hoboken, Nueva Jersey: Wiley; 28 (2), pp. 248-261.es_AR
dc.identifier.issn1466-822X
dc.identifier.otherCCPI-FCEQyN-A-014
dc.identifier.other6335
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12219/4263
dc.descriptionFil: Dugger, Phillip James. Universidad de Antioch Nueva Inglaterra. Departamento de Estudios Ambientales; Estados Unidos.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: Böhning-Gaese, Katrin. Instituto Senckenberg-Leibniz. Centro de Investigación de la Biodiversidad y el Clima de Senckenberg (Frankfurt); Alemania.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: Böhning-Gaese, Katrin. Universidad Goethe. Instituto de Ecología, Diversidad y Evolución; Alemania.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: Chama, Lackson. Universidad de Copperbelt. Escuela de Recursos Naturales. Departamento de Zoología y Ciencias Acuáticas; Zambia.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: Correia, Marta. Universidad de Coímbra. Centro de Ecología Funcional. Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida; Portugal.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: Dehling, D. Matthias. Universidad de Canterbury. Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas. Centro de Ecología Integrativa; Nueva Zelanda.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: Emer, Carine. Universidad Estatal Paulista. Instituto de Biociencias. Departamento de Ecología; Brasil.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: Farwig, Nina. Universidad de Marburgo. Facultad de Biología; Alemania.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: Fricke, Evan C. Universidad Estatal de Iowa. Departamento de Ecología, Evolución y Biología Organismal; Estados Unidos.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: Galetti, Mauro. Universidad Estatal Paulista. Instituto de Biociencias. Departamento de Ecología; Brasil.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: García, Daniel. Universidad de Oviedo. Departamento de Biología de Organismos y Sistemas; España.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: García, Daniel. Universidad de Oviedo. Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Biodiversidad; España.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: García, Daniel. Principado de Asturias (España). Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Biodiversidad; España.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: Grass, Ingo. Universidad de Göttingen. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Departamento de Ciencias de los Cultivos; Alemania.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: Heleno, Ruben. Universidad de Coímbra. Centro de Ecología Funcional. Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida; Portugal.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: Jacomassa, Fábio André Facco. Universidad Estatal Paulista, Departamento de Zoología; Brasil.es_AR
dc.descriptionFil: Jacomassa, Fábio André Facco. Universidad Estatal do Centro Oeste. Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas. Programa de Pos‐Graduación en Biología Evolutiva; Brasil.es_AR
dc.description.abstractAim: Biogeographical comparisons of interaction networks help to elucidate diffeences in ecological communities and ecosystem functioning at large scales. Neotropical ecosystems have higher diversity and a different composition of frugivores and fleshy‐fruited plants compared with Afrotropical systems, but a lack of intercontinental comparisons limits understanding of (a) whether plant–frugivore networks are structured in a similar manner, and (b) whether the same species traits define the roles of animals across continents. Location: Afrotropics and Neotropics. Time period: 1977–2015. Taxa: Fleshy‐fruited plants and frugivorous vertebrates. Methods: We compiled a dataset comprising 17 Afrotropical and 48 Neotropical weighted seed‐dispersal networks quantifying frugivory interactions between 1,091 fleshy‐fruited plant and 665 animal species, comprising in total 8,251 interaction links between plants and animals. In addition, we compiled information on the body mass of animals and their degree of frugivory. We compared four standard network level metrics related to interaction diversity and specialization, accounting for differences related to sampling effort and network location. Furthermore, we tested whether animal traits (body mass, degree of frugivory) differed between continents, whether these traits were related to the network roles of species and whether these relation ships varied between continents. Results: We found significant structural differences in networks between continents. Overall, Neotropical networkswere less nested and more specialized tan Afrotropical networks. At the species level, a higher body mass and degree of frugivory were as sociated with an increasing diversity of plant partners. Specialization of frugivores increased with the degree of frugivory, but only in the Neotropics. Main conclusions: Our findings show that Afrotropical networks have a greater overlap in plant partners among vertebrate frugivores than the more diverse networks in the Neotropics that are characterized by a greater niche partitioning. Hence, the loss of frugivore species could have stronger impacts on ecosystem functioning in the more specialized Neotropical communities compared with the more generalized Afrotropical communities.en
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.format.extent1.014 KB
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishingen
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329183676_Seeddispersal_networks_are_more_specialized_in_the_Neotropics_than_in_the_Afrotropics
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectAfrotropicsen
dc.subjectBirdsen
dc.subjectEcological networksen
dc.subjectFrugivoryen
dc.subjectMacroecologyen
dc.subjectMammalsen
dc.subjectMutualismen
dc.subjectNeotropicsen
dc.subjectSeed dispersalen
dc.titleSeed‐dispersal networks are more specialized in the Neotropics than in the Afrotropicsen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess